Category Archives: Random Randomness

Gyakuten Translator

This is really crazy! As you might know, I am still in the process of translating my Gyakuten Saiban fanbook. I'm still working on it, and there are a few bits (mostly colloquial dialogue that the text books don't think anyone needs to know). So I've been using the Bing Translator to help with these bits, and I was surprised to find...

gyakutentranslate

Heh heh. Phoenix Wright. I wonder who compiles the databases for this.

What Do You Think the Hopkinsville Goblins Were?

  • Bulletproof aliens 50% (7 votes)
  • A hoax 21.43% (3 votes)
  • No idea whatsoever 14.29% (2 votes)
  • Bulletproof pranksters 7.14% (1 votes)
  • Jinn 7.14% (1 votes)
  • Bulletproof owls/monkeys 0% (0 votes)

Total Votes: 14

The Kelly–Hopkinsville encounter is the name given to a series of incidents of close encounters with supposed extraterrestrial beings. These were reported in the autumn of 1955, the most famous and well-publicized of which centred around a rural farmhouse at the time belonging to the Sutton family, which was located between the hamlet of Kelly and the small city of Hopkinsville, both in Christian County, Kentucky, United States. It is from these main incidents that the entire case takes its name.

Continue reading →

Emergencies, Phones and Tablet Drivers

You know, as someone with object empathy, I tend to hang on to stuff for ages, usually forever. Trade in my DSi XL for a 3DS XL? Are you kidding? Ain't gonna happen. But of course there comes a time when one has to let go.

First of all, there is my phone. Now let me tell you, I've had this baby a long time. 9 years to be exact. September 2003: I still remember the day. You wanna know the model? It's a Nokia 3310. It's silver right now. But at other times, it's variously navy, red, blue, green or yellow. They disconnected my SIM in 2010 because I didn't top up for 2 years. What I'm saying is, it makes no sense for me to splash out on a fancy new phone every year, when I hardly ever use it. That's asociability for you. Why do I even have a phone, then? For emergencies. And here is the problem.

Continue reading →

Mysterious Wreckage in Space

This was taken directly from a book called Mystery, Intrigue and Suspense (Chancellor Press, 1992). I think it's a compilation of previously published titles. I know the unsolved crime chapter has already been published in The World's Greatest Unsolved Crimes. The rest may have been published elsewhere.

Anyway, this is one I haven't been able to find much info about anywhere else. Maybe the whole thing was one big hoax — a lot of the cases in this book have proven to be. It's interesting nevertheless. I'm interested to hear your thoughts on the matter.

The following text is copyright Chancellor Press and I don't really have permission to quote it, but what the heck. Fair Dealings/Fair Use is a thing.

Continue reading →

Ruby Redfort — Look Into My Eyes


I can see two obvious things that are wrong with this book, just from the cover:

  1. The first Ruby book is supposed to be called There was a Girl Called Ruby
  2. The Ruby books are supposed to be written by Patricia F. Maplin Stacey

Reading further in:

  1. Ruby Redfort is 13. She is supposed to start her spy career at age 11
  2. I'm sure there were one or two more, but I've forgotten

Now, you see, whenever I read Clarice Bean's talking about Ruby Redfort, I shall feel slightly disorientated that she is reading a different set of Ruby books from the rest of us. It's a shame.

On to the book itself. Continue reading →

More on Alignments

I mentioned this in my last post, but here is the breakdown:

Chaotic Neutral

A chaotic neutral character follows his whims. He is an individualist first and last. He values his own liberty but doesn't strive to protect others' freedom. He avoids authority, resents restrictions, and challenges traditions. A chaotic neutral character does not intentionally disrupt organizations as part of a campaign of anarchy. To do so, he would have to be motivated either by good (and a desire to liberate others) or evil (and a desire to make those different from himself suffer).

A chaotic neutral character may be Continue reading →

Align Thyself!

I'm getting utterly quite confused about alignments these days. It's strange, because I always thought of myself as being a goody-goody Lawful Good. Certainly at work I'm trusted to do things and know things which I would not normally be authorised to do and know.

So I was doing this quiz the other day What D&D Character Am I? and surprisingly, I'm a Chaotic Neutral Elven Ranger/Mage (what rules are they playing by? Elves can't multi-class as ranger/mages). So I knew already that I'm an elf, but Chaotic Neutral? Really?

You see, according to the official AD&D 2e definition:

Chaotic neutral characters believe that there is no order to anything, including their own actions. With this as a guiding principle, Continue reading →

Feralian Profile

feralians
Background: ~struckdumb/~pureplayas529 | Phoenix's hand refs: here and here

Appearance: Feralians are similar in height and build to humans. The obvious difference is their rich-brown wings. When in non-winged form, only the eye colour gives it away; their eyes being bright orange or, very rarely, silver. Their hair ranges from dark brown to almost black, and both sexes wear it long.

They favour simple, utilitarian clothing, having little time for adornment. It's a custom for everyone to wear an armband with their name.

Continue reading →

Shiawase no Hako English Translation

Salyu — Iris — 幸せの箱


I know there are a few of these floating about the interwebz, but this is my translation practice. I'm still a beginner, so the translation is probably very literal and full of mistakes. I'm happy for anyone to tell me where and why I've gone wrong and so on. Enjoy!

Continue reading →
あなたの方が知っていた 私が大事にしてたもの

また会えることを信じて 約束もせずに手を振った		 You knew better about the things I was cherishing.
Believing that we could meet again, we waved farewell without promise. [1]

So No Two Snowflakes Are Alike, Huh?

Dr Karl was talking about this some time ago on Up All Night, I just forgot to gloat about it earlier.

Anyway, this is something that has bugged me since I first heard it. No two snowflakes are alike. How could they possibly know, considering the billions and billions of snowflakes that have fallen since the dawn of time. You're telling me not even one single flake had a twin at some point in time? Not even one..?

I don't remember which episode it was, but he has a written version online. I will quote some of it here:

Wilson A. Bentley, a farmer who was born, lived and died in the small town of Jericho in Vermont was called "The Snowflake Man". He supported this "all snowflakes are different" theory. Around 1884, at the age of 19, he became the first person to photograph a single ice crystal, by cleverly marrying a microscope to a camera, using an adjustable bellows mechanism. In 1920, the American Meteorological Society elected him to the state of Fellow. They also awarded him their very first research grant, in recognition of his "40 years of extremely patient work" - for which they gave him $25. He continued working in this field until his death in 1931, by which time he had taken 5,381 "photomicrographs" of individual snowflakes. Towards the end of his life, he said that he had "never seen two snowflakes alike". And so the story arose that all snowflakes are different.

But in 1988, the scientist Nancy Knight (at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado) was studying wispy high altitude cirrus clouds. Her research plane was collecting snowflakes on a chilled glass slide that was coated with a sticky oil. She found two identical (under a microscope, at least) snowflakes in a Wisconsin snowstorm.

They were hollow hexagonal prisms, rather than the classical six-spoked star-shapes – but as far as snowologists are concerned, they counted as snowflakes. But if you want to be pedantic, they probably weren't identical if you were to look at the actual molecules – but at this level, is anything identical?

Since the earth was formed about 4.5 billion years ago, about a million million million million million snowflakes have fallen – but Mr. Bentley made his pronouncement of the cold hard facts after looking at just over 5,000 of them.

See ABC Science for the full article.

All I wanna say is: nyah nyah nyah nyah nyaaaah.